Human-reviewed Evidence Briefs connect candidate information to your role, surface strengths, gaps and unknowns, and prepare focused interview questions.
Bring candidates you already have. For hiring search needs, start with an exploratory conversation.
Explore a fictional example of how professional evidence can be organized around a role. It illustrates the format, not a completed client engagement.
Sources Reviewed: 4 public PRs, 1 system architecture RFC, 1 live production telemetry report, 3 verifiable employment references
Candidate architected and authored Kafka event consumers processing >12,000 req/sec with documented circuit breakers and idempotency keys.
Authored Helm charts and deployment manifests, but production root access and failover recovery were managed by a dedicated platform SRE squad.
No verifiable repository commits or documentation demonstrate accounting ledger double-entry systems. UNKNOWN remains UNKNOWN.
Resume indicates sole lead architect; commit history reflects collaborative co-authorship across a 5-engineer team. Requires focused interview probe.
“Ask the candidate to trace a single transaction rollback across the Kafka boundary when the ledger reconciliation failed in their 2025 platform migration.”
We agree the role context and review scope, examine permitted evidence, and use human review to document findings and questions. The hiring decision stays with your team.
Start with the role and the questions you need to explore. Do not send candidate information at this stage.
Acceptance, reviewer availability, and legal and operational requirements must be resolved before candidate data is accepted.
For accepted work, examine the permitted sources within the agreed scope. Missing evidence stays explicit.
A person reviews the findings and limitations before any agreed output is released.
Use the agreed review output to identify what to explore in an interview. The trial remains a limited review.
One real candidate you provide, reviewed in relation to a defined role. Initial scope hypothesis: up to two relevant professional claims, with mandatory human review.
Subject to eligibility, acceptance, available review capacity, and agreed data handling conditions.
Candidate data and delivery can proceed only after acceptance and the legal and operational requirements have been met.
Review candidates you already have. Paid prices are experimental pilot prices, subject to scope assessment, acceptance, and reviewer availability.
For a focused review of one candidate you already have.
Experimental pilot price; not commercially validated. Subject to scope assessment, acceptance, and availability.
For teams that already have candidates.
Experimental pilot price for up to three client-provided candidates. Scope, availability, review depth, number of deliverables, and revisions must be confirmed before acceptance.
For recruiting agencies and IT consultancies exploring evidence review support. We discuss your requirements and assess possible scope and availability before proposing an engagement.
Discuss a PartnershipPrices are in USD. Paid work requires confirmed scope, acceptance, availability, and agreed commercial terms. Payment arrangements are discussed privately before work begins. Do not send candidate information with an initial inquiry.
We agree what will be reviewed and what output is included.
A request does not automatically reserve review capacity.
USD 495 and USD 1,250 are pilot prices, not validated commercial pricing.
Candidate data is accepted only after the relevant requirements have been met.
Walk through a fictional Evidence Brief and discuss how a review might support your recruiting process. The synthetic demo is separate from a trial and uses no real candidate data.
Clear answers on our methodology, commercial terms, and evaluation boundaries.
Discuss a candidate review, ask about trial eligibility, or explore the format with a synthetic demo.
Subject to scope, acceptance, availability, and legal and operational requirements. Do not send candidate information with an initial inquiry.